Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Koshire, Alka
- Study of the Haemodynamic Response to Oral Clonidine as Pre–medication in Laparoscopic Surgeries
Abstract Views :220 |
PDF Views:90
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anaesthesiology at MVPS Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nasik, IN
1 Department of Anaesthesiology at MVPS Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nasik, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 1, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 1–6Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery is a boon for surgeons as it reduces tissue trauma, post–operative morbidity, hospital stay and healthcare costs. However, it is not possible to perform a laparoscopic procedure unless a proper anaesthetic procedure is available to combat the additional haemodynamic stress of pneumoperitoneum with CO2 insufflation and the patient’s position1,2. Use of an alpha–2 against tablets such as clonidine helps in blunting the adverse haemodynamic response during laparoscopy3,4. Aims of this study were: To study haemodynamic response to oral clonidine tablet during endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. To study haemodynamic response to oral clonidine tablet in the intraoperative period in laparoscopic surgery. To study side–effects of clonidine. Materials and Methods: This prospective placebo controlled study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, in a tertiary health care centre attached to a medical college. A total of 60 patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery in the age group of 18–60 years belonging to ASA grade 1 & 2 were included in the study. After appropriate preoperative evaluation they were divided into 2 groups. Group C (n = 30) received Tab. Clonidine 150 mcg orally. Group V (n = 30) received a placebo Vitamin tablet. After appropriate premedication, patients were given general anaesthesia. Various parameters like pulse rate, Non–Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) including systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure, ETCO2 were measured pre–operatively, during intubation and at various points intraoperatively. Statistical analysis was done using statistical package for Social Sciences Ver. 18. The results was expressed in mean and standard deviation. Independent t–test was used to compare mean of the two groups. For the purpose of this study, 95% confidence limit was chosen and corresponding p–value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Conclusion: We found that pre–medication with oral clonidine provides haemodynamic stability and protection against the stress response triggered by laryngoscopy, intubation and pneumoperitoneum with CO2 in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. It also was found to reduce nausea, vomiting and shivering post–operatively.Keywords
Clonidine, Haemodynamic, Laparoscopy- Omphalocele: a Case Report
Abstract Views :288 |
PDF Views:100
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik, IN
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 1, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 42–43Abstract
A neonate with giant omphalocele was posted for repair on 3rd day of life. Anesthesia management was challenging as liver and intestines herniated through the anterior abdominal wall defect. Anticipating post-operative respiratory embarrassment, the child was kept on ventilatory support for two days, recovered fully.Keywords
Gaint Omphalocele, Abdominal Wall Defects- Comparison of Success Rate of Classical Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block with and without Nerve Stimulator
Abstract Views :207 |
PDF Views:89
Authors
Sayali Patil
1,
Alka Koshire
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 4, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 135-140Abstract
Introduction: Brachial plexus block has now evolved into valuable and safe alternative to general anesthesia for upper limb surgeries. The nerve stimulation technique make use of electric current to elicit motor stimulation of nerves and confirm the proximity of the needle to the nerve, thereby avoiding the discomfort caused due to paresthesia leading to good success rate, even when the pa-tient is uncooperative or uncommunicative. Aim and Objectives: To compare between paresthesia technique and use of nerve locator in performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block with respect to success and complication rate. Materials and Methods: A comparative study was conducted at department of Anesthesia of a tertiary care centre. A total of 100 patients undergoing upper limb elective surgery were included after satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The anesthetic method employed was Brachial plexus block by Supraclavicular Approach: using paresthesia technique (Group A: 50 subjects) and; by using Nerve Stimulator technique (Group B: 50 subjects). Both the groups of patients were studied for performance time, sensory block, and motor block and for success rate. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS ver. 21. Results: Onset of sensory and motor block were significantly faster in nerve stimulator group as compared to paraesthesia group (p<0.05), also the duration of block was more in nerve stimulation group (7.28 vs 6.54 hrs; p-0.057). Failure of block was seen in 22% patients with paraesthesia technique as compared to 14% with nerve stimulation (p-0.44). No difference was observed between the groups on the basis of complication rate (10% vs 2%; p-0.2). Conclusion: Onset of sensory and motor block was shorter and duration of analgesia was longer with nerve stimulation group. Nerve stimulation was found more effective than paraesthesia with respect to degree of success and complication rate.Keywords
Brachial Plexus Block, Nerve Stimulator, Paresthesia.References
- Moore D. Supraclavicular approach for block of the brachial plexus. Moore D, editor. Regional block. A handbook for use in the clinical practice of medicine and surgery. 4th ed.Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher; 1981.p. 221–41.
- Labat G. Regional anaesthesia. Its technic and clinical application.Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1922.
- Winnie AP. Historical consideration. Plexus Anaesthesia.1984; 1:43–116,192–202.
- Liguori GA, Zayas VM, Ya Deau JT. Nerve localisation techniques for interscalene brachial plexus blockade: A prospective, randomised comparison of mechanical paresthesia versus elec-trical stimulation.
- Chapman GM. Regional nerve block with the aid of a nerve stimulator. Anesthesia. 1972; 27:185–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1972.tb08195.x
- Sathyan N, Hedge H, Padmanabha S, Anish KA. Brachial plexus Block: A Comparison of Nerve locator versus paraesthesia technique. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences.2014; 13(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-131100610
- Liguori GA, Zayas VM, YaDeau JT, Kahn RL, Paroli L, Buschiazzo V, Wu A. Nerve localiza-tion techniques for interscalene brachial plexus blockade: A prospective, randomized comparison of mechanical paresthesia versus electrical stimulation. Anesthesia and Analgesia.2006 Sep 1; 103(3):761–7. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000229705.45270.0f PMid:16931693
- Franco CD, Vieira ZE. 1,001 subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blocks: Success with a nerve stimulator. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2000 Feb 29; 25(1):41–6.https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200001000-00008
- Baranowski AP, Pither CE. A comparison of three methods of axillary brachial plexus anaesthe-sia. Anaesthesia. 1990 May 1; 45(5):362–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14776.x PMid:2356931
- Bansal P, et al. Comparison of interscalene brachial plexus blockade by eliciting multiple point paresthesia and electrical nerve stimulation techniques: a prospective, randomized trial. The In-ternet Journal of Anesthesiology. 2009; 23(2):1–6.
- Masoud NG, Taghi MM, Reza MG, Maarouf A, Seyedabolhasan S, Naser G. Complications of supraclavicular block of brachial plexus using compound classic and perivascular techniques. Rawal Med J. 2007 Jan; 32:60–2.
- Comparison of Haemodynamic Parameters and Recovery Profiles of Desflurane Versus Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Abstract Views :313 |
PDF Views:101
Authors
Affiliations
1 P.G. Resident, Department of Anesthesia, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Professor and Head, Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
1 P.G. Resident, Department of Anesthesia, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Professor and Head, Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 6, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 158-164Abstract
Introduction: Inhaled anaesthetics are the most widely used drugs for maintenance of general anaesthesia because of their ease of administration and predictable intraoperative and recovery characteristics. Newer inhalational agents such as Desflurane provide several advantages over the older inhalational agents. Desflurane has a very low blood-gas partition coefficient [about 30% less than Sevoflurane] and low oil-gas partition coefficient [about 64% less than Sevoflurane]. Objectives: Our main aim to conduct this study was to compare the hemodynamic parameters and recovery profiles after Desflurane vs. Sevoflurane anaesthesia in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Materials and Methods: It was a comparative prospective randomized study conducted after consent from institutional ethical committee. Study included 80 ASA I-II patients aged between 20-60 years, of either sex scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40 patients each. Group ‘D’ received Desflurane as anesthetic agent and Group ‘S’ received Sevoflurane as anesthetic agent for maintenance of anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters were observed perioperatively. Recovery profiles of patients were noted after giving reversal. Results were calculated using statistical tests. Results: Time required for eye opening, extubation, verbal response and to attain an Modified Aldrete score of ≥9 was significantly shorter in Group D as compared to Group S. Hemodynamic parameters [pulse, BP, SpO2] were comparable in both groups. Conclusion: Desflurane administration in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy was associated with stable peri-operative hemodynamic parameters, faster early recovery and not significantly higher side effects.Keywords
Desflurane, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Sevoflurane.References
- Ortega RA, Kelly LR, Yee MK, Lewis KP. Written in granite: A history of the Ether Monument and its significance for anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct; 105[4]:838-42. PubMed PMID: 17006083. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200610000-00030 PMid:17006083
- Jacob AK, Kopp SL, Bacon DR, Smith MH. The history of anesthesia. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC. Clinical Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 4- 27.
- Torri G. Inhalation anesthetics: A review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Mar; 76(3):215-28. Review. PubMed PMID: 20203550.
- Stoelting RK, Hillier SC. Inhaled Anesthetics. In: Stoelting RK, Hillier SC. Handbook of Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 46-80
- Eshima RW, Maurer A, King T, Lin BK, Heavner JE, Bogetz MS, et al. A comparison of airway responses during Desflurane and sevoflurane administration via a laryngeal mask airway for maintenance anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003; 96:701-5 https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000048978.40522.AB PMid:12598249
- Ebert TJ, Schmid PG. Inhaled Anesthetics. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC. Clinical Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 413-422
- Muellejans B1, López A, Cross MH, Bonome C, Morrison L, Kirkham AJ. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Crit Care. 2004 Feb; 8(1):R1-R11. Epub 2003 Nov 20.[ISRCTN43755713].
- Stoelting RK, Hillier SC. Inhaled anesthetics. In: Stoelting RK, Hillier SC. Handbook of Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 46-80
- Naidu-Sjösvärd K, Sjöberg F, Gupta A. Anaesthesia for videoarthroscopy of the knee. A comparison between Desflurane and sevoflurane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Apr; 42(4):464-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05143.x PMid:9563868.
- Patel SS, Goa KL. Desflurane. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its efficacy in general anaesthesia. Drugs. 1995 Oct; 50(4):742-67. Review. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199550040-00010 PMid:8536556.
- Patel SS, Goa KL. Sevoflurane. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its clinical use in general anaesthesia. Drugs.1996 Apr; 51(4):658-700. Review. Erratum in: Drugs 1996 Aug;52[2]:253. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199651040-00009 PMid:8706599.
- Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttimann UE, Callan CM. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg. 1996 Nov; 83(5):917-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199611000-00005 PMid:8895263.
- Njeze GE. Gallstones. Niger J Surg. 2013 Jul; 19(2):49-55. doi:10.4103/1117-6806.119236. Review. PubMed PMID: 24497751.
- Nathanson MH, Fredman B, Smith I, White PF. Sevoflurane versus desflurane for outpatient anesthesia: A comparison of maintenance and recovery profiles. AnesthAnalg. 1995 Dec; 81(6):1186-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539199512000-00012 PMid:7486102.
- Dupont J, Tavernier B, Ghosez Y, Durinck L, Thevenot A, Moktadir-Chalons N, et al. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Mar; 82(3):355-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/82.3.355 PMid:10434815.
- Magni G, Rosa IL, Melillo G, Savio A, Rosa G. AnesthAnalg. 2009 Aug; 109(2):567-71. doi: 10.1213/ ane.0b013e3181ac1265. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e 3181ac1265 PMid:19608833.
- Dexter F, Bayman EO, Epstein RH. AnesthAnalg. 2010 Feb 1; 110(2):570-80. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b5dcb7 PMid:19820242.
- Jindal R, Kumra VP, Narani KK, Sood J. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Jan; 55(1):36-42. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.76604. PubMed PMID:21431051; https://doi.org/10.4103/00195049.76604 PMid:21431051 PMCid:PMC3057243
- Eshima RW, Maurer A, King T, Lin BK, Heavner JE, Bogetz MS, et al. AnesthAnalg. 2003; 96:701-5.
- La Colla L, Albertin A, La Colla G, Mangano A. Faster wash-out and recovery for Desflurane vs Sevoflurane in morbidly obese patients when no premedication is used. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep; 99(3):353-8. Epub 2007 Jul 9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem197 PMid:17621601
- Kaur A, Jain AK, Sehgal R, Sood J. Hemodynamics and early recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane in bariatric surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan; 29(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.105792 PMid:23493107 PMC3590538.
- Comparison of Haemodynamic Response among Patients Posted for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with or without Oral Clonidine as Premedication- A Prospective Comparative Study
Abstract Views :119 |
PDF Views:93
Authors
Affiliations
1 Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
2 Former PG Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
1 Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
2 Former PG Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 54-59Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgeries and has now being recognized as the gold standard for the treatment of cholelithiasis. It is known fact that laparoscopy has several advantages due to creation of pneumoperitoneum during the surgical procedure which is responsible for several deleterious haemodynamic and cardiorespiratory changes. Thus, our present study was designed tostudy of haemodynamic response to oral clonidine as pre medication in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 128 patients between the age group of 18-60 years, belonging to ASA 1 and ASA 2 categories scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia were categorized into 2 groups as Group C and Group NC with 64 patients in each group. Patients in Group C received premedication with oral clonidine 150μg 90 minutes prior to surgery and Group NC did not receive oral clonidine 150μg. The two groups were compared with respect to heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and post operative complications. Results: There was significant increase in all the haemodynamic variables in group C as compared to group NC where the variables remained close to baseline while the patients in Group C showed less post operative complications as compared to NC group. Conclusion: Oral premedication with clonidine helps in blunting the haemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum and also has less post operative complications.Keywords
Clonidine, General Anaesthesia, Haemodynamic Response, Laparoscopic CholecystectomyReferences
- Vecchio R, Mac Fayden BV, Palazzo F. History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med. 2000; 42:87-90.
- Girish PJ. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Canadian journal of Anesthesia. 2002; 49(1): 45-49 https://doi. org/10.1007/BF03018135
- Cunningham AJ, Brull SJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Anaesthetic implications. Anesthesia Analgesia. 1993; 76:1120-33. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199305000- 00035 PMid:8053989
- Milne editorial alpha 2 aginists and anesthesia. Can J Anesth. 1991; 38;7:809-813. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF03036952 PMid:1683817
- Suzanne O-W. Laparoscopic surgery- effects on circulatory and respiratory physiology: An overview. European Journal of Surgery. 2000 Nov; 166:4-11. https://doi. org/10.1080/110241500750009627 PMid:10688209
- Singh S, Arora K. Effect of oral clonidine premedication on perioperative haemodynamic response and post operative analgesic requirement for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Jan- Feb: 55(1):26-30 https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.76583 PMid:21431049 PMCid:PMC3057241
- Suug CS, Lin SH, Chan KH, Chang WK, Chow LH, Lee Ty. Effect of oral clonidinepremedication on perioperative haemodynamic response and post operativeanalgesic requirements for patoents undergoing laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy. ActaAnesthsiology Sin. 2000 Mar; 38(I):23-9
- Singhal SK, Kaur K, Arora P. Oral clonidine versus gabapentin as premedicant for obtunding hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014; 8(2):172-177. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658- 354X.130692 PMid:24843327 PMCid:PMC4024671
- Kalra NK, Verma A, Agarwal A, Pandey HD. Comparative study of intravenously administered clonidine and magnesium sulfate on haemodynamic responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol ClinPharmacol. 2011; 27:344-8. https://doi. org/10.4103/0970-9185.83679 PMid: 21897505 PMCid: PMC3161459.
- Chandrashekaraiah MM, Upadya M, Jayachandran SP, Wali M. Effects of clonidine premedication on haemodynamic changes during laproscopic cholecystectomy- A randomized control study. Applied Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiology. 2011; 15: 91-98.
- Nicolaou G, Chen AA, Johnston CE, Kenny GP, Bristrow GK, Giesbrecth GG. Clonidine produces a dose dependant increase in the sweating threshold and dose dependant decrease in vasoconstriction and shivering threshold. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 1997 Jun; 44(6):636-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015448 PMid:9187784